Why Lee Aase is Mayo Clinic’s Social Media MacGyver

It’s no secret that Lee Aase and the Mayo Clinic have embraced social media. Blogging, podcasting, YouTube… you name it and they’ve experimented with it, and in most cases been successful. I was fortunate enough to sit in on Lee’s session at the 2009 Ragan Corporate Communications Conference: “The $4 a week online newsroom and other MacGyver Tips.”

maclee

Lee (who is much taller in real life than expected) was kind enough to post his presentation to his blog. He shared simple secrets for quickly and effectively building a social media presence. While a lot of the tools he shared weren’t necessarily new, the reasons for using them in certain ways and the approach taken at the Mayo Clinic were what really got me thinking. Here are a few examples:

1. The Mayo Clinic has three blogs, and all are hosted at WordPress.com. They pay ~$10 a year to repoint the domain name to a mayoclinic.org site. My initial thought was, “Why aren’t they using WordPress.org and self-hosting the blog?” After all, it offers far more in the way of plugins, themes and features. (Click here for a quick explanation of the difference between these two platforms.) But Lee made a few great points. By hosting with WordPress.com, his team doesn’t have to go through the clinic’s corporate IT department. They don’t have to deal with firewalls, internal servers or just generally bogged down IT processes. Secondly, hosting the blogs on WordPress.com brings them more traffic. The Mayo Clinic blogs are often featured on the front/login page of WordPress.com, allowing many people to discover the blog that way. WordPress.com also has fairly simple analytics built in to the platform, so no one on their staff needs to go in-depth learning the ins and outs of Alexa or Google Analytics. And by repointing the domain name, they preserve the ability to eventually move to a different platform and not lose all of their search ranking.
Key Takeaway: Don’t always opt for the most advanced tool. Pick simple tools that reduce entry barriers allow you to get started.

2. With an existing “Medical Edge” radio show, the Mayo Clinic was already in the habit of content creation. It converted this show to a podcast and pushed it out through its blog. It’s also easier for busy doctors to record audio or video than it is to get them to write out a blog post. With a $150 Flip Video camera, Lee and his staff can interview doctors and researchers and post excerpts to the blog quickly and with minimal editing. There’s no need to invest in expensive A/V equipment and the training required for communications team members to use it.
Key Takeaway: Use existing content to ease your organization into social media. Find out the easiest way to get people to contribute (audio, video, writing) so that they’ll be more willing to participate.

3. “Don’t just pitch the media, be the media.” Lee agreed that this was somewhat overstated, but essentially the Mayo Clinic is creating its own content and that content is driving interest from traditional, mainstream media. The Mayo Clinic’s news blog has become a place for journalists to access information on Mayo Clinic research, publications, public health experts and patient stories. Lee’s even been successful with keeping certain posts embargoed and only accessible to journalists before releasing to the public. The content that the clinic creates and shares on its social media outposts has been picked up by national news outlets including CBS and the Wall Street Journal. Videos posted to The Mayo Clinic’s branded YouTube channel have been published online alongside news stories. Having so much rich content available in so many forms (blogs, audio, video) makes the media relations team’s job that much easier – in many cases the journalists are calling them to ask about content that’s been posted.
Key Takeaway: Create and share your organizations own original content. Make it interesting so that journalists will want to know more. Develop content in a variety of formats so that any outlet can use it.

Lee’s presentation really emphasized that social media can be pretty simple. Don’t complicate things. Pick tools that let you get started right away, use content that’s already at your disposal, and offer it up in a variety of formats that make it easier for reporters and customers to gobble up.

For more goodness from Lee, enroll in his Social Media University, Global, and become a Smuggle!

Ragan Recap: Communications, Chicago-style

chicagoI’m so exhausted after three days in Chicago that I can barely stay awake to write this post. I took in slightly more information than I did beer in the Windy City (but not by much) and want to share my impressions of the 2009 Ragan Corporate Communicators Conference and some of what I learned in the sessions.

A few of the sessions I attended were so outstanding that they warrant their own individual posts that will come later this week (stay tuned). The others were quite solid. I predominantly went to workshops on the PR/Marketing Communications track. Here’s a rundown of some of my favorites:

ComEd: Generating positive publicity when the lights are on

ComEd Communications Manager Jeff Burdick led this session and started with a slide that said: “99.95% of the time, you DO have power!” But of course, that’s not what customers want to hear during an outage. The average customer is only without power for a total of four hours in a given year. Obviously storm and outage communication is a major issue for utility companies, but during the rest of the time when everything’s buzzing along, how do they generate interest? ComEd focuses on pitching stories about reliability and infrastructure investments, its employees, environmental projects, and corporate citizenship. ComEd targets local TV news and smaller, community-based newspapers (many of which aren’t suffering and closing at the rate of large metropolitan dailies).
Key takeaway: Look for “Riches in the Niches” and leverage unique, local angles in stories. Don’t always focus on the largest media outlets

Wells Fargo: Flexible communications in the face of merging organizations

Presented by Kathleen Golden, VP of Public Relations for Wells Fargo Wealth Management Group, this session focused on the 2008 acquisition of Wachovia by Wells Fargo and the associated communications challenges. When merging the leadership of two organizations, speculation runs rampant among employees and the media. Who’s getting what job? Who’s leaving, who’s staying? Why are they structuring the new company this way? Communicators in this situation have to have the pulse of what’s being said and address any misinformation as soon as possible. But, it’s okay to tell stakeholders that you don’t have the answers yet.
Key takeaway: Establish a process for both sides of a merger to share, receive and distribute information. Address rumor and specualtion as much as possible with the information you have on hand to diffuse any issues. Involve communications early on in the merger process.

Word of Mouth Marketing – Get customers talking about you

I was a bit disappointed in Andy Sernovitz’s session, mostly because I felt he didn’t share anything beyond what you could get from his book or blog. All of the examples he used were primarily B2C companies (Skittles, Zappos, Duct Tape), which I think generally lend themselves to more viral, word-of-mouth activities and campaigns. It can be much harder to get a bunch of supply chain managers to become rabid fans of plastic fasteners or concrete forms or raw chemicals. While Andy had some good tidbits here and there, I was bummed that I skipped some of the other sessions going on at this time (including Katie Paine’s) to go to this one.
Key takeaway: Make it easy for customers to talk about your brand. Create content that they can participate in and make their own, then share with their friends.

Calculating the ROI of your communications – turning results into dollars

Angela Sinickas offered ways to measure communications efforts and show how communicators can take credit for behavior changes that earn or save money for a company. I’m not sure I fully understood her approach, as she seemed to advocate for continually adjusting either the costs incurred or the value derived to achieve the ROI result you wanted. In the corporate communications roles that I’ve held, the finance team would pretty quickly sniff out any data massaging like that. The other issue I had was that her approach relied on having good data available – which many communicators don’t always have at their disposal. But the basic concepts were intriguing and I think I’ll refer back to her slides and check her Web site out to learn more.
Key takeaway: Only behavior changes can have a dollar-value attached to them, so measure that. Calculate communications ROI on a project basis instead of trying to do it annually for an entire department.

chicagogangOverall

As is usually the case, the best part of the conference was getting to meet so many great people. It was fantastic to have lunch with Katie Paine and see Shonali Burke at the cocktail hour. I got to meet Amber Naslund, Rachel Esterline and Ari Adler at the unconference. I hit the town with Mike Pilarz, Allan Schoenberg and Amber Porter Cox. I had my first Bell’s Beer (and my second, and my third…) and took an extra day with my good friend and travel companion Christine Hartter (who also wrote a great conference recap) to check out The Bean and the Art Institute. Verdict: Chicago is my kinda town!

Image via Flickr user amymengel (thanks to the waiter who snapped the pic above!)

Join me June 19 at Social Media Breakfast Tech Valley

Well, I had planned to do a “soft launch” of all the content for the inuagural Social Media Breakfast Tech Valley this week while Patrick Boegel and I scrambled to find a second sponsor. I set up the Facebook group, Twitter account, event registration page and a page on this site (see the SMB-TV link above) and figured I’d publish everything to test it out and then let it sit dormant until I nailed down a co-sponsor and was ready to start promoting.

Hah! Not so much. The registration site was quickly found out and within the first 24 hours of the registration site going live, almost half the seats are gone! Apparently there’s a lot of interest in the Capital Region in learning more about social media.

I’m truly excited to bring this event to Tech Valley. We have a trio of outstanding panelists lined up for the first event: Stuart Foster, Mike Germano and Rhea Drysdale are all extremely knowledgeable in the social media space and I’m sure they’ll give us lots to think about. It will also be great to meet and network with other social media enthusiasts in the area. I hope you’ll join us Friday, June 19, from 8-10 am at the BluStone Bistro in Colonie.

If you’re interested in attending, grab a seat now! They’re free, thanks to our sponsorship from All Over Albany, but seats are limited. Guess we’ll have to get a bigger room for SMB-TV #2!

*We’re still in need of a co-sponsor for this event! Please contact me if your organization is interested in partnering with us and co-sponsoring SMB-TV #1 with All Over Albany.

UPDATE: SUNY Cobleskill has agreed to not only sign-on as co-sponsor for SMB-TV#1, but they are also committing to being involved as a sponsor for SMB-TV#2. Thanks, SUNY Cobleskill!

Here’s my “I’d like to thank the Academy” speech: I’m very grateful to Arik Hanson for putting the bug in my ear and encouraging me to take this on. Thanks to Bryan Person, SMB founder, for offering his thoughts and advice on how to get this started in Tech Valley. Many thanks to Patrick Boegel for being a great sounding board and helping with the planning. I’m so appreciative of Greg & Mary at All Over Albany for their sponsorship and to our three panelists for agreeing to be SMB-TV guinea pigs. And I’m thankful to everyone who’s attending the event! Looking forward to the first of what I hope will be many great breakfasts!

Who’s boarding the train to FriendFeed?

friendfeed-logoI created a FriendFeed account a few months back but haven’t done much with it since. I liked the idea of linking all my social profiles together and getting all my online ducks in the same pond, but just didn’t feel like FriendFeed was really where most of my friends were. I had created a strong network on Twitter and didn’t want to have to go manually re-subscribe to all my Twitter pals on FriendFeed (and many of them didn’t have FriendFeed accounts). I liked the idea of some of the features (being able to comment on what someone tweets, bookmarks, or posts, for example) but couldn’t get into the habit of visiting the site more than maybe once a week. Even with the redesign that just launched, it just wasn’t sticky enough for me.

However, in the last few days I’ve had an influx of subsciption requests (currently my FriendFeed account is protected). Many of these have come from people whom I’ve nurtured relationships with on Twitter and I’m happy to let them subscribe and get a fuller picture of what I’m doing online. Some subscription requests seem fairly dubious and spammy and I’ve hit the ignore button on those. It’s not just me who’s noticed the increase:

macktweet

So what’s driving this spike in FriendFeed interest? Is there another Ashton/CNN race that I’m unaware of? Or is Jesse Newhart right and the “cool kids” are now moving away from Twitter as it becomes more mainstream, commercialized, spammy? He argues that FriendFeed offers a “more coherent conversation” and “better aggregation of content,” but I’m not entirely sold.

On the one hand, FriendFeed just seems like too much information for me. Follow someone like Robert Scoble and your FriendFeed stream turns into an endless aggregation of people liking and commenting on every single thing he posts. True, I don’t HAVE to follow anyone, just as with Twitter, but trying to keep the noise level down on FriendFeed means being very selective and not following any of the “big guns” who post prolificly and have legions of fans/harpies vying for attention via “likes” and comments. And it all comes through so fast that even though I follow just a tiny, tiny handful of people right now, it’s cluttered.

On the other hand, FriendFeed isn’t enough informaiton – meaning that for most of the people I subscribe to, it’s nothing more than a regurgitation of their Twitter stream. Why shouldn’t I just keep using Twitter, then? FriendFeed might add the occasional Flickr image or Delicious save, but for me, it’s mostly just Tweets.

To be fair, I’m sure that I’m not really using FriendFeed “the right way.” I haven’t set up or joined groups yet and I don’t have my feed segmented. I really haven’t taken the time to force myself to become comfortable with it, and maybe I won’t have to for a while.

I’m not sure if this increased interest means that the winds are changing and people will start rushing to FriendFeed soon. But if the point of social media is to “go where the conversations are” then we may all be heading toward FriendFeed sooner than we think.

Do you use FriendFeed? Is it a substitute of compliment to Twitter for you? How do you sort through all the information it provides?