Facebook dominates how people share content on the Web

Check out this chart was posted last month to Silicon Alley Insider: Facebook is the most popular platform for sharing content — even surpassing e-mail:

Chart

It’s perhaps no surprise, then, that sites like Google Reader have attempted to become more Facebook-like recently, adding the ability to follow friends and “like” links or posts. Delicious also recently made changes in hopes that the site will become a more interactive place for sharing links instead of a repository for storing them.

What also caught my eye was how fractured the social bookmarking sites are. There doesn’t seem to be a truly dominant service among Digg, StumbleUpon, Reddit… all hover in the 3-5 percent range.

With Facebook continuing to grow at a surprising clip, adding users and also buying up the technology and talent of FriendFeed, it’s well on its way to becoming the online content-sharing juggernaut. But while it’s slowly moving away from this direction, most of Facebook’s content sharing still happens behind the wall. It’s tough to do a detailed analysis on what people are saying about content after it’s shared on Facebook. Accessing, aggregating and interpreting that information is the real goldmine for marketers and advertisers.

The chart data comes from Add to Any, which is the toolbar I use on the blog to allow readers to share or save content. It’s one of many similar options blogs and Web sites can use to encourage content-sharing (Share This, TweetMeme, Socialize) so I’m unsure as to how the data would hold up if the study were replicated across all these services.

What are your impressions of the chart? Have you made changes to your organization’s Web site so that users can easily share your content to Facebook? Would the fractured nature of social bookmarking sites deter you from incorporating a bookmarking strategy into your campaigns?

Friday Fun – You kiss your mother with those tweets?!

I’m pretty convinced the creativity of Twitter application developers knows no bounds. Yesterday I stumbled upon a few-months-old app called Cursebird, a real-time feed of people swearing on Twitter (via Christina Gayle). Not entirely sure how this advances humanity as a whole, but it’s pretty fun. I ran some of my favorite Tweeps through Cursebird to see just how colorful their tweets are. In descending order of profanity — enjoy.

lisaavatar@lisabarone swears like a George Carlin Wannabe

Ranked: 4,919th worldwide Swears: 204 Score: 100 of 100


rheaavatar@rhea swears like an Enthusiastic Porn Star

Ranked: 84,356th worldwide Swears: 31 Score: 96 of 100


amberavatar@ambercadabra swears like a Scottish Comedian

Ranked: 203,667th worldwide Swears: 14 Score: 91 of 100


olivieravatar@thebrandbuilder swears like a Gangsta Rapper

Ranked: 313,027th worldwide Swears: 9 Score: 86 of 100


jenavatar@rockstarjen swears like a Drunken Sailor

Ranked: 521,164th worldwide Swears: 5 Score: 77 of 100


spinksavatar@davidspinks swears like Eric Cartman

Ranked: 565,910th worldwide Swears: 4 Score: 75 of 100


arikavatar@arikhanson swears like a Construction Worker

Ranked: 740,255th worldwide Swears: 3 Score: 67 of 100


dannyavatar@dannybrown swears like a Bad Golf Player

Ranked: 957,796th worldwide Swears: 2 Score: 57 of 100


fleetavatar@davefleet swears like a Primary School Teacher

Ranked: 1,564,183rd worldwide Swears: 1 Score: 30 of 100


mengelavatar@amymengel swears like a Children’s TV Presenter

Ranked: 1,405,829th worldwide Swears: 1 Score: 37 of 100


russellavatar@karenrussell swears like a Horse Whisperer

Ranked: 2,089,041st worldwide Swears: 1 Score: 6 of 100


pilarzavatar@mikepilarz swears like a Mute

Ranked: Bottom Swears: 0 Score: Lame of 100


Now get the eff back to work!


Local news station’s Twitter strategy: Tonight at 11

I follow the Twitter streams of all five local news stations in my area. (Yes. Five. The Albany area has less than a million people but five local TV stations each with 5+ hours of news coverage a day. Really, not that much interesting stuff happens here. But that’s another post for another day.)

Three of the stations use Twitter solely to send out automated tweets with links to their news stories. Sure, these stations can say they are “on” Twitter, but I don’t think automation like that adds much value.

The two others stations are much more interesting. The local CBS affiliate allows its field reporters all to post to the account, so you often get a sense of how they go about tracking down stories based on watching the feed. They share lots of links but not all are to news stories; some are just interesting tidbits about the area.

RooneyThe NBC affiliate, WNYT, also does a good job of giving a human voice to its Twitter feed and not just automating the account. I met Chris Rooney, who manages the station’s Twitter account, at Social Media Breakfast Tech Valley and reached out to him to get a better sense of how they go about managing the social media strategy at the station. Here are some excerpts from my e-mail interview with him:

On getting started with Twitter

“Our experience with Twitter started in January, just before the big Twitter boom.  We sent Benita Zahn [6 p.m. anchor] to Washington, D.C. to cover the inauguration and wanted to her to post to our site from the road.  It seemed too cumbersome to expect her to lug around a laptop and login to our CMS in the field.

Our creative services director, Rob Madeo, and I had both dabbled a little with Twitter on our own at the point and we both thought it would be a good solution for Benita.  So I set up and account for her and she tweeted from the inauguration via text messages.

About six weeks later, we sent [sports reporter] Andrew Catalon to Ohio to cover the Siena Saints in the NCAA Tournament and decided we wanted him to tweet from to road too.  So we set up an account for him and likewise I encouraged him to continue tweeting upon his return. Rodger Wyland [sports anchor] appeared interested in all this.  So we gave him an account too.”

On moving away from the “glorified RSS feed” Twitter model

“Shortly after the inauguration, I set up a general WNYT account.  Initially it just regurgitated our local news RSS feed.  But early on we started to not only post original tweets, but to also retweet others and even pass along links to other news outlets, for example an interesting article from the New York Times.  This made our Twitter feed feel like it served more of a purpose than just being a glorified RSS reader.  It just seemed like the proper use for it.  After all, we’re in the information sharing business.”

On using Twitter to cover breaking news

“The Buffalo commuter plane crash and the Binghamton shootings really showed us the power of Twitter for a news outlet.  These were major breaking news events and we were able to quickly and easily pass along rapid updates as the stories developed.  We also passed along relevant links we had dug up, like Google Maps street views of the locations involved or sites were you could listen to police scanner transmissions.

Likewise, Twitter proved an effective way to keep people up to date in real time with the developments during the craziness in the NY State Senate this summer.”

WNYTsenate

On ditching what doesn’t work

“Early on, in addition to sending out news updates, we used our feed for promotions – telling people what was coming up on the 5 p.m. news or that there was a new episode of 30 Rock on tonight.  But we gave up on that pretty quickly.  I got the sense that our followers wanted to know what was happening right now, not a tease for what was going to happen later on.”

On managing the flow

“Right now I’m pretty much in charge of Twitter at our station with help from a few other people.  I post our tweets and follow numerous other feeds (I use Twhirl mostly) and quickly alert the newsroom when I see something interesting (we’ve picked up a few story tips this way).

I also encourage our reporters and photographers to take pictures in the field and send them to Twitpic.  We’re starting to do more of this, although I wish we were doing it even more often.

WNYTtwitpic

I’ve been a little reluctant to pass out our Twitter password to everyone in the newsroom.  That makes tweeting from the field difficult for our reporters.  But now that I’ve figured out how to get around that by using a TwitterMail account I hope to have everyone tweeting on the main WNYT account soon.  For a lot of our staff, it’s still something a little new and foreign to them, but hopefully that will change.”

On single vs. multiple Twitter accounts

“We’ve had an interesting internal debate over the value of individual accounts or having one central one.  For example, you’ll note that Rodger, Andrew and our back-up sports guy Mike Levin all have individual accounts (Mike set his up on his own).  We were going to do that for our weather guys too, but instead decided to create a single “First Warning” account for them all to share.

There are two schools of thought on this.  I guess the thinking is that it’s easier for people to only have to follow one feed and it reinforces the First Warning brand.  Personally, I prefer letting them have individual accounts.  I think it helps personalize our talent and gives people a chance to feel connected to them.  I guess you can make an argument either way.”

On using Facebook, too

“We also maintain a WNYT Facebook page.  I launched that not long before Facebook redesigned the public profiles.  When I created it, I wasn’t really sure what to do with it.  I was mainly just staking our claim in the Facebook world.  As with Twitter, I initially set it up to send a feed of all of our stories to the page.  I was never really pleased with how that worked and started picking and choosing stories to post by hand instead.

Even still though, I was posting a lot – maybe too much, especially when it came to the harder news stories.  It was my wife who actually pointed out to me that people mainly use Facebook for fun, to socialize and escape.  They don’t want to see news about the fatal fire showing up on their start page.  So with that in mind, I started being much more selective, posting the stories I think are mostly likely to spark a conversation or that people will find particularly interesting.

WNYTFB

Facebook has also proved helpful during severe weather events, giving people a place to share photos and videos of the hail storm or the flooding or whatever else Mother Nature is dumping on us this summer.  These photos always seem to generate a lot of “likes” and comments.”

Thanks, Chris, for taking the time to share how WNYT is learning and navigating the social media waters.

What are you seeing in your local markets? How are local TV news outlets engaging with you via social media in innovative ways?

(Update Aug. 14 — A few folks have pointed out to me via Twitter that Albany’s local ABC affiliate, WTEN, is also using Twitter beyond just an RSS feed. They post links to stories and also weather reports and updates from certain reporters. Thanks for clarifying).

Volunteering via YouTube: Content creation for nonprofits

One of the reasons that social media marketing is so attractive is the notion that it’s “free” to use these tools to create and share your message — there’s no charge to participate via Twitter, upload content on YouTube or create a Facebook fan page. But of course that’s not entirely true. The time costs are significant. Organizations that want to have some really cool online content often have to spend good money to hire professionals to develop and create that content.

While some brands have the budget available to hire a production company to create slick, creative video, most nonprofit organizations don’t have those resources. Even if they do have a decent video camera on hand, they may not have staff members with enough time to sit and brainstorm creative ways to tell the organization’s story via video and then plan, shoot, edit and upload it.

Enter YouTube’s video volunteers, which launched a few weeks ago. It’s a way for nonprofits to crowdsource the  development and production of video by tapping into the creative juices of YouTube’s many users. The program is in conjunction with Google’s All for Good initiative that aims to be a broader online volunteer matching service.

I’ll let the vlogbrothers give you particulars:

Some of the organizations requesting help on the video volunteers page right now include a military family support group, a environmental sustainability partnership and an organization that combats global poverty. They are looking for videos to use to promote their organization, support fundraising efforts and serve as a call to action for volunteers.

It’s early in the project, so it’s hard to tell if this approach will be successful or if the organizations will end up with either no takers or submitted videos that don’t meet their needs or quality standards. But I think it’s an interesting approach in matching up creative talent with organizations who need it, and the nonprofits really have nothing to lose by putting a request out there and seeing what the video volunteers come up with. I also see it as an opportunity for students or professionals who are out of work to get some experience working with a client and developing content that not only helps the organization but also can become a part of their professional portfolio.

The video volunteers program is the type of collaboration that really gets me excited about the social web. I think it’s really the tip of the iceberg in terms of allowing people and organizations to collaborate across geography and skill sets and overcome resource constraints to some extent.  I’m hopeful that this type of venture will be successful. Doritos certainly found success crowdsourcing its Super Bowl ads — although perhaps submissions were motivated by the prizes and exposure that the Doritos contest offered. I don’t know if altruism is as strong a motivator.

What are your thoughts? Do you think it has potential? Will it fizzle? If you work with non-profit organizations, would you consider enlisting the help of YouTube’s video volunteers?

Why are we all screaming for lifestreaming?

Can someone please explain “lifestreaming” to me? Because I don’t quite get it. Yes, I read Steve Rubel’s post. I’ve had a Posterous account for a while but never really got into it. I’ve seen all of the recent sexy statistics about how Tumblr has taken off. It’s certainly a trendy topic of late, but it still doesn’t quite make sense to me.

LifestreamingI can understand how it may work for people who don’t want to fully commit to blogging or want a place to quickly and  publicly throw up pictures or blurbs. My sister-in-law has actually done this for the past year with a Tumblr page since my nephew was born (warning: cuteness abounds). It was much easier for her to create a Tumblr page than a full-on blog. She’s able to post photos, brief video clips and the occassional paragraph or two.

I can also see where folks with common names might use Tumblr or Posterous as their primary site if their preferred domain name was taken. Mike Germano does this (and doesn’t always seem to happy about it; I think if he had his druthers he’d love to wrestle mikegermano.com away from his jazz musician name-twin). However, I’ve also seen people, like Kris Colvin, use Tumblr as the platform to run their self-hosted Web domain, like you would with WordPress or TypePad. My friend Jeff Bean at Bike Crave touts Tumblr’s “cleanest, most spare design ever” as its biggest benefit.

But if someone already has a blog with a domain name, what benefit does lifestreaming add? I’m not trying to be combative here; I’m genuinely curious.

Sure, there are pieces of the Web I find now and then that I want to share. Maybe it’s something worth sharing but isn’t appropriate for my blog or doesn’t inspire me to write an entire post about. In that case I’ll tweet the link if I want to share it publicly. If  I want to add my own commentary and I can’t keep it under 140 characters, I’ll probably post it to Facebook for those behind my walled garden to see. I suppose in those cases I could be sharing and sending those links to a Posterous or Tumblr page. But can we really count on those who follow us to check out our blog AND our Twitter stream AND our Facebook wall AND our lifestream? (Yes, I know that’s what Friendfeed and other aggregators are for, but Lord knows I haven’t figured out that one yet either.)

Stuart Foster argued a few weeks ago that he’d rather read fleshed out, comprehensive blog posts than snippets of thought here and there on a lifestream, especially from “thought-leader” bloggers like Rubel. I tend to agree, though I’m willing to give this idea of lifestreaming a fair shot and try to understand how and when it can be useful.

So for those of you who have figured it out, help me to get it. What are the benefits of lifestreaming? How are people using Tumblr and Posterous in ways that are different or better or more innovative than simply having a blog and sharing items via Twitter or Facebook?

What am I missing?

Image via Flickr user leadenhall