Ragan Recap: Communications, Chicago-style

chicagoI’m so exhausted after three days in Chicago that I can barely stay awake to write this post. I took in slightly more information than I did beer in the Windy City (but not by much) and want to share my impressions of the 2009 Ragan Corporate Communicators Conference and some of what I learned in the sessions.

A few of the sessions I attended were so outstanding that they warrant their own individual posts that will come later this week (stay tuned). The others were quite solid. I predominantly went to workshops on the PR/Marketing Communications track. Here’s a rundown of some of my favorites:

ComEd: Generating positive publicity when the lights are on

ComEd Communications Manager Jeff Burdick led this session and started with a slide that said: “99.95% of the time, you DO have power!” But of course, that’s not what customers want to hear during an outage. The average customer is only without power for a total of four hours in a given year. Obviously storm and outage communication is a major issue for utility companies, but during the rest of the time when everything’s buzzing along, how do they generate interest? ComEd focuses on pitching stories about reliability and infrastructure investments, its employees, environmental projects, and corporate citizenship. ComEd targets local TV news and smaller, community-based newspapers (many of which aren’t suffering and closing at the rate of large metropolitan dailies).
Key takeaway: Look for “Riches in the Niches” and leverage unique, local angles in stories. Don’t always focus on the largest media outlets

Wells Fargo: Flexible communications in the face of merging organizations

Presented by Kathleen Golden, VP of Public Relations for Wells Fargo Wealth Management Group, this session focused on the 2008 acquisition of Wachovia by Wells Fargo and the associated communications challenges. When merging the leadership of two organizations, speculation runs rampant among employees and the media. Who’s getting what job? Who’s leaving, who’s staying? Why are they structuring the new company this way? Communicators in this situation have to have the pulse of what’s being said and address any misinformation as soon as possible. But, it’s okay to tell stakeholders that you don’t have the answers yet.
Key takeaway: Establish a process for both sides of a merger to share, receive and distribute information. Address rumor and specualtion as much as possible with the information you have on hand to diffuse any issues. Involve communications early on in the merger process.

Word of Mouth Marketing – Get customers talking about you

I was a bit disappointed in Andy Sernovitz’s session, mostly because I felt he didn’t share anything beyond what you could get from his book or blog. All of the examples he used were primarily B2C companies (Skittles, Zappos, Duct Tape), which I think generally lend themselves to more viral, word-of-mouth activities and campaigns. It can be much harder to get a bunch of supply chain managers to become rabid fans of plastic fasteners or concrete forms or raw chemicals. While Andy had some good tidbits here and there, I was bummed that I skipped some of the other sessions going on at this time (including Katie Paine’s) to go to this one.
Key takeaway: Make it easy for customers to talk about your brand. Create content that they can participate in and make their own, then share with their friends.

Calculating the ROI of your communications – turning results into dollars

Angela Sinickas offered ways to measure communications efforts and show how communicators can take credit for behavior changes that earn or save money for a company. I’m not sure I fully understood her approach, as she seemed to advocate for continually adjusting either the costs incurred or the value derived to achieve the ROI result you wanted. In the corporate communications roles that I’ve held, the finance team would pretty quickly sniff out any data massaging like that. The other issue I had was that her approach relied on having good data available – which many communicators don’t always have at their disposal. But the basic concepts were intriguing and I think I’ll refer back to her slides and check her Web site out to learn more.
Key takeaway: Only behavior changes can have a dollar-value attached to them, so measure that. Calculate communications ROI on a project basis instead of trying to do it annually for an entire department.

chicagogangOverall

As is usually the case, the best part of the conference was getting to meet so many great people. It was fantastic to have lunch with Katie Paine and see Shonali Burke at the cocktail hour. I got to meet Amber Naslund, Rachel Esterline and Ari Adler at the unconference. I hit the town with Mike Pilarz, Allan Schoenberg and Amber Porter Cox. I had my first Bell’s Beer (and my second, and my third…) and took an extra day with my good friend and travel companion Christine Hartter (who also wrote a great conference recap) to check out The Bean and the Art Institute. Verdict: Chicago is my kinda town!

Image via Flickr user amymengel (thanks to the waiter who snapped the pic above!)

This post is not about Oprah. Well, mostly not.

failwhale

…Beacuse I don’t really care about Oprah. Or Ashton. Or CNN. Twitter is going mainstream. The cool kids who were on it first are bent out of shape now. It’s like any trend – a small group starts it out, enough people notice so that it gets picked up and becomes mainstream, then the original trendsetters are suddenly upset that they’re no longer unique (see: “I liked Coldplay before they got all like, cool, and like, sold out and stuff.”)

I am not going to blog about Oprah adding Twitter to her Favorite Things and whether that’s good, bad or the end of the world. But lots of other communicators who I respect have weighed in, some very thougtfully.Some have their panties quite bunched about it, and some don’t really care. So for those of you who are interested, here’s a round up from my Google Reader as of 2:45 p.m. today:

From Ike Pigott at Media Bullseye:

“The Oprah Experiment”
Oprah built her empire of fans through traditional media channels. Most successful Twitter users built their networks organically. How will her network evolve? And will how will Twitter mine the user data that these power accounts create?

From Beth Harte at The Harte of Marketing:

“Let’s not forget celebs are marketers too”
Celebs make money. They can potentially use social media to make more money. Should they be exempt from the scrutiny that businesses face when dabbling in social media for marketing purposes?

From Ari B. Adler at Digital Pivot:

“Social Interaction Requires Being Social (and Interacting)”
Ashton and Oprah don’t get it. Twitter is a conversation, not a megaphone. It’s not about the numbers.

From Arik Hanson at Communications Conversations:

“It’s all about the numbers, right? RIGHT?
Social media is about numbers AND relationships. Number of followers has its place as a metric, but you have to build strong relationships, too.

From David at The Legends of Aerocles:

“@Oprah, Welcome to Twitter. Now please don’t break it. Why @Oprah and @aplusk don’t belong on Twitter”
Twitter is not for broadcasting. How can you possibly interact with 1 million followers? Why are you on Twitter if you’re not conversing?

From Lisa Barone at Outspoken Media:

“It’s not the recession, you just suck”
Stop talking about Oprah, dammit! Do something useful. Learn something. We’re wasting too much time on stuff that isn’t making us any money.

So there’s my Oprah/Ashton speedread. Let’s get on with our Fridays, shall we?