Reaching stakeholders through social media

Here are the slides from the presentation I gave today to the Capital Region Chapter of PRSA:

View more presentations from amymengel.

Here are some links to content I referenced:

If you’d like to attend Social Media Breakfast on Oct. 30, register here (still a few seats left).

Let me know if there’s anything I’ve missed that you’d like a link to.

Five reasons corporations are failing at social media

rocket“It’s not rocket surgery.”

That malapropism became a bit of a mantra at last week’s Inbound Marketing Summit.

Social media isn’t complicated. When you boil it down it’s about listening to your customers, being helpful by offering your knowledge and giving them interesting content to share and thereby advocate for you. The IMS speakers shared several case studies (yes, too many of them mentioned Comcast and Zappos) on how organizations have embraced social media to connect with and built trust and affection among customers. None of the examples required hyper-specialized knowledge or technology for a company to connect with people.

So why is it so difficult for so many companies to successfully integrate social media? I dug through my (30 pages of) notes to try and find some themes in what the speakers shared and came up with a this list of why organizations might be getting hung up.

1. They can’t talk about anything broader than their own products

Chris Brogan shared how Citrix Online created the Workshifting community to address the rise of telecommuting and remote work. Sure, it ties in with Citrix’s GoToMeeting/Webinar/PC product line, but the blog isn’t a commercial for its products. The same holds true for Kodak’s photography blog that Chief Blogger Jenny Cisney talked about. It’s about photography and creativity in general, not about Kodak cameras. Greg Matthews shared how Humana developed the Freewheelin bicycle sharing communities with plenty of online and “real life” components to the program. Bicycles don’t have much to do with health insurance specifically, but they are about being healthy. If a company is only talking online about its specific products and not looking for ways to connect to the bigger picture, it’s pretty difficult for people to be engaged.

2. They listen to customers but don’t take any action

If you’re going to listen to your customers, you’d better be ready to do something about what you hear. Valeria Maltoni noted that if a company creates an online presence that’s open and allows customer feedback, it creates the expectation that the company is going to do something with that feedback. Worse than not being heard is being heard and then ignored. Paula Berg from Southwest Airlines shared how a simple blog post stating the airline was considering assigned seating amassed tons of customer comments showing a lack of support for the idea. This feedback changed the direction of their internal debate and led to a new boarding procedure that maintained the open seating arrangement.

3. They aren’t calibrated internally with the technology

Jason Falls chastised corporate Web sites for being little more than online brochures. Customers expect interaction. Content creation is key to social media success, and every company should have a Web site with a content management system that allows for quick, easy content creation without the IT department needing to recode a Web site. Anyone in the organization should be able to publish via a CMS. And companies can’t expect to have a strong social media presence when social sites are blocked internally to employees.

4. They’re not framing risk accurately

Dharmesh Shah reminded us all that a corporate blog has never been fatal to an organization. NBC cameraman Jim Long said the often a company’s entry into social media is a clumsy, shotgun blast and that there’s an equal chance of looking foolish by having a ham-fisted marketing department launch a social media presence as there is if a rogue employee “goes off” on Twitter. The risk of social media is not abated by not participating. And really, while there have certainly been some hiccups and miscues along the way, social media has yet to be the undoing of any company.

5. Their internal culture isn’t aligned for social media success

In Shiv Singh’s presentation, he discussed how the customer should be at the core of the brand. When policies, procedures, products and processes become more important than the customer, there’s no way social media efforts can be effective. When your employees are more concerned with what’s in or out of their job description than doing the right thing to help the customer, that’s not a culture that’s likely to build trust and advocacy for your brand. Yes, Zappos was cited time and again as a case study, but largely because it has a culture that makes social media work. All of its employees are focused on customer service at the core. The same holds true for Southwest Airlines.

I could go on and on. So many of the speakers at IMS shared great examples of simple, effective social media strategies that have humanized organizations and allowed them to build better relationships with customers. But time and again companies are either rejecting social media or participating in a way that defeats the purpose.

It’s not rocket surgery.

Image via Flickr user StephenHackett

How I use Google Reader without going insane

It’s a never-ending refrain in the social media world: “There’s just so much content out there!” So many good blogs to read and think about. For a while my Google Reader was getting out of control as I continued to add RSS feeds.

I’ve tried various ways to get a handle on the many blogs I read, but my latest incarnation is to group all my social media/marketing blogs into folders, labeled by the frequency with which I want to read them:

Google Reader Organization

Blogs in my “Check Daily” folder are my top priority. These bloggers typically post regularly and it’s content that I continue to find valuable or thought-provoking. Currently blogs from folks like Amber Naslund, Olivier Blanchard, Dave Fleet and Todd Defren are in this folder.

Next is my “Check Weekly” folder. It consists of interesting blogs that either don’t post as frequently or that I’m not as religious about following. Their posts might not usually be as time-sensitive and I can wait until later in the week to catch up. Or they may tend to be bloggers who write longer posts that take me more than just a few-minute scan in the morning to digest. I try to rotate different bloggers into this folder every so often. Right now people like Tom Martin, Brian Solis, Jason Baer and Mack Collier live here.

My “Twitter Friends and Tweeted Posts” folder is where I put a lot of bloggers I’m friends with whose content I’m likely to see on Twitter long before I get around to checking my reader. Arik Hanson, Lauren Fernandez, David Mullen and Scott Hepburn are all in this folder. Usually I see tweets and retweets to their new posts throughout the day and so I really just use this folder to scan headlines and peek at any posts that I might have missed. For the most part, though, the posts that end up in this folder are ones that I’ve already seen.

The folder I call “Popular and Prolific” features blogs like Chris Brogan, Danny Brown, Copyblogger and HubSpot. These are “big name” blogs that post a lot of content. I don’t necessarily have time to read them every day, but I can count on their content being good and useful and I want it all in one place to go back and access later.

My last folder is the “Check Infrequently” folder. These are blogs that don’t update frequently or that I haven’t found a real connection with yet – but I still want to be alerted when new content is available. I find that I enjoy blogs that are less frequent but more thoughtful. Every once in a while I’ll check this folder to see if Lisa Hoffmann or Shonali Burke have anything new.

To see what posts I like and am sharing, you can check out my Google Reader public share page.

The result of this folder system: It’s still way too much content, but at least now I feel like I can take it in chunks and read a little at a time based on how I’ve prioritized the blogs I’ve subscribed to. Every few weeks I’ll look at the trends and analytics that Google Reader provides and see if there are blogs that I’m consistently reading or not reading and move them to a different folder (or unsubscribe) as a result.

What works for you in organizing your RSS feeds? Do you use a plug-in like Postrank to help you sort through content? Do you find yourself relying less on your feed reader to discover new content? I certainly see plenty of posts shared on Twitter, but I’m in no way ready to give up RSS because I feel like I’d miss too much.

Share your strategy for managing the beast that is your feed reader in the comments.

“Become a Fan” of Facebook brand fatigue

I grabbed a bagel sandwich at Bruegger’s today, which is somewhat of a weekly habit for me. On a large poster in the store depicting their fall sandwiches, I saw it in the lower right corner: Become a fan of Brueggers on Facebook. I’ve seen similar exhortations lately in restaurants, retail stores and on brand Web sites.

Brueggers Facebook Fan PageNow, I had my Blackberry right there with me and could have pulled it out and fanned Brueggers on the spot. But I didn’t. And I spent a good chunk of my lunch thinking about why I had no desire to fan this brand. I eat there regularly, I enjoy their food, the service is good… but frankly, I just didn’t feel like I’d get anything out of becoming a Bruegger’s fan on Facebook.

I’m suffering from Facebook Brand Fatigue. I’ve noticed that my inclination to fan brands has decreased lately, just as more and more bands seem to be coming around to Facebook and creating pages. I’m fans of 22 brands on Facebook, ranging from TV shows to restaurants to beer to my cousin’s Celtic band. In most cases, I’ve hidden fan page updates from my news feed, which pretty much defeats the purpose of being a fan (other than the notion of “tattooing” my profile with cool logos). I mostly use Facebook to keep up with friends and family and it’s hard enough to catch all of their updates, let alone sort through the tons of fan page items flood the stream.

The brands that I enjoy being fans of generally don’t update too much on Facebook (a quick way to ensure I hide them) but offer just enough content to keep me interested or curious. For example, The Big Bang Theory posts a video clip each Monday, which usually gives me a laugh (or 17) but then allows me to go about my Facebook business for the rest of the week without interruption from them.

There are plenty of brands I love and am loyal to, but I feel like I’m burning out on fan pages. What does it really do for me to fan Bruegger’s on Facebook? If I became a fan of every TV show I watched, restaurant I ate in, merchant I bought from or city I visited it would completely overwhelm my Facebook experience.

So, here are my new rules for becoming a fan on Facebook:

  1. I gotta love ya. I mean really, really love ya. I need to be an actual FAN of your brand, not just a customer, user or visitor. I will only fan brands that I am passionate about and would wholeheartedly recommend to my closest friends.
  2. I need to see the value that your page provides. What do you offer me as a fan? How is it different than just visiting your Web site? I will only fan brands that offer me real value that I can’t get elsewhere from them on the Web. Can you give me cool links, exclusive video, or a place to offer my feedback (and get a response)?
  3. I won’t fan sites that post too frequently or auto-post feeds from a blog or Twitter. I don’t want to fan brands only to have to hide them. I will only fan brands that don’t disrupt my Facebook experience by clogging my news feed.

Three simple rules, for starters. What are yours? How do you make the decision what to become a fan of on Facebook? And once you do, how do you interact with those pages? Share your strategy in the comments.

Women “uninfluenced” by social media. Australians are.

Is brand participation in social networking really making a difference with customers? Two studies on consumer reactions to social networking were released on Wednesday that both tried to answer this question.

The first study, from Q Interactive and released at ad:tech Chicago, surveyed 1,000 women and found that they are “overwhelmingly uninfluenced” by a brand’s presence in social media. It found that 54 percent of women are likely to friend or fan a brand via a social network but that 75 percent said social networking sites don’t influence what they buy.

The second study was conducted in Australia and found that conversations on social networks about poor customer experiences are “severely harming” the reputations of organizations who are called out on these sites. The research indicated that 25 percent of respondents boycotted a particular organization after reading a negative review or comment about it on a social networking site, and of that quarter, 42 percent had been previous customers of the particular organization.

At first glance,  the studies appear to be at odds with each other. I realize that it’s a fallacy to make a direct comparison here, but look at the broader picture. In the first example, the women are being asked about the brand’s activity on social networks and whether it influences them. In the second, the respondents are being asked about whether information posted by other users of the network influences them. Big difference.

People trust people more than brands. People will even trust people they don’t know when it comes to online opinions. A negative review or account of a poor customer service experience on Facebook or Twitter will carry more heft than a brand sharing its “story” on a Facebook fan page or campaign microsite.

hearingWhere the two concepts cross is the conclusion in the second part of the Australian study: Of social network users who claimed to have posted a negative review, 60 percent of them would welcome interaction from the organization to address the issue.

I may not be influenced to buy any/more of a product because I follow them on Twitter or are a fan of them and receive their updates on Facebook. But if I notice a friend’s blog post, Yelp review, or tweet about a terrible experience with the company, I’m likely to be turned off and choose to do business elsewhere. I give credence to my friends’ opinions. That’s still a case of being “influenced” by social media networks — just not in the positive way that the first study sought to measure. However, if I refer to that negative review and see that the company in question took the time to craft a thoughtful response and address the issue, I’m likely to give them a shot and may even respect them more for doing so.

Man, woman, American, Australian — it comes down to which side of the conversation is more effective for brands: talking or listening. Taken together, these two studies show that listening is clearly the winner.

Image via Flickr user kpishdadi